| Sumario: | Based on two international research projects critically analyzing university policies to combat Sexual and Gender-Related Violence (SeGReV), contrasted with experiences of university profiles seeking to find possible good practices, this paper focuses on the Mexican case. A content analysis of ten intervention protocols was conducted, together with four individual interviews with key figures in the design of the protocols, as well as three focus groups with surviving students of SeGReV. The dialogue between what the protocols propose on the one hand, and the experiences of experts and survivors on the other, highlights the need not only to make this violence visible, but also to seek solutions adopting a complex, intersectional gender perspective.
|
|---|
