Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes
Based on a review of recent studies conducted in various rural communities in the new migration regions, this article critically reviews two interpretations of rural family studies: the peasant economy as a production-consumption unit and the household development cycle. In the current conditions, i...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Langue: | espagnol |
| Éditeur: |
El Colegio de México A.C.
2013
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx/index.php/edu/article/view/1440 |
| Institution: |
Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos |
| authentication_code | dc |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1844255018457235456 |
| author | Arias, Patricia |
| author_facet | Arias, Patricia |
| author_sort | Arias, Patricia |
| category_str_mv |
"Bolivia", "hyperinflation", "economic crisis", "Bolivia", "hiperinflación", "crisis económica"
|
| collection | OJS |
| description | Based on a review of recent studies conducted in various rural communities in the new migration regions, this article critically reviews two interpretations of rural family studies: the peasant economy as a production-consumption unit and the household development cycle. In the current conditions, internal and international migration play a key role in rural communities. Many studies have shown the willingness of women to leave home and join migratory flows for personal reasons, or due to specific situations and demands. Their departure has contributed to the breakdown of the traditional systems of organization and reproduction of the peasant family. Feminists, and subsequently studies with a gender perspective, criticized the view that rural families were production-consumption units where decisions corresponded to a model of family strategies for survival and reproduction (Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf , 1990). That model favored homogeneity, collectivity, solidarity and consensus, in other words, it assumed that households had no conflicts or tensions when it came to making decisions that involved everyone (Ariza, 2007). The family was a “moral economic unit” based on the principles of “reciprocity, consensus and altruism” (Grasmuck and Pessar, 1991). Studies from a gender perspective pointed out that there were power relations in families based on a hierarchical, unequal distribution of rights, resources and authority that particularly affected women (Ariza, 2007; González Montes, 2002; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf, 1990). This criticism reached migration studies: migration was not an exclusively male phenomenon; women migrants were not appendages of male migration and their displacement could be based on personal motivation (Ariza, 2007; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007). |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx:article-1440 |
| index_str_mv | CONAHCYT LATINDEX PKP Index DOAJ DORA Redalyc Scielo México CLASE Handbook of Latin American Studies (HLAS) JSTOR Dialnet Sociological Abstracts EBSCO Host HAPI HELA Scopus Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory CIRC CSA Worldwide Political Science Abstracts Google Scholar IBSS Biblat Current Abstracts Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek Frei zugängliche Emerging Sources Citation Index de Web of Science IBZ Gale OneFile: Informe Académico Journal Scholar Metrics (EC3 Research Group: Evaluación de la Ciencia y la Comunicación Científica. Universidad de Granada) Periodicals Index Online CARHUS Plus de la Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) CiteFactor Directory Indexing of International Research Journals IBR International Bibliography of Sociology Matriu d’Infomació per l’Avaluació de Revistas (MIAR) Open access digital library. Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries PAIS International Political Science Complete PubMed Social Services Abstracts SocINDEX SocINDEX with Full Text TOC Premier Europe PMC HEAL-Link Hellenic Academic Libraries Link MECS (México Ciencias Sociales) Population Index on the Web Population Information Online Portal de Periódicos de la Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/MEC) Portal de Periódicos da CAPES |
| journal | Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | El Colegio de México A.C. |
| record_format | ojs |
| Terms_governing_use_and_reproduction_note | Derechos de autor 2013 Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| data_source_entry/ISSN | Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2013): 82, January-April; 93-121 Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2013): 82, enero-abril; 93-121 2448-6515 0186-7210 |
| spelling | oai:oai.estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx:article-14402025-03-14T22:47:00Z Migration, Peasant Economy and Domestic Development Cycle. Discussions and Recent Studies Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes Arias, Patricia migration peasant economy domestic development cycle migración mujeres economía campesina ciclo de desarrollo doméstico Based on a review of recent studies conducted in various rural communities in the new migration regions, this article critically reviews two interpretations of rural family studies: the peasant economy as a production-consumption unit and the household development cycle. In the current conditions, internal and international migration play a key role in rural communities. Many studies have shown the willingness of women to leave home and join migratory flows for personal reasons, or due to specific situations and demands. Their departure has contributed to the breakdown of the traditional systems of organization and reproduction of the peasant family. Feminists, and subsequently studies with a gender perspective, criticized the view that rural families were production-consumption units where decisions corresponded to a model of family strategies for survival and reproduction (Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf , 1990). That model favored homogeneity, collectivity, solidarity and consensus, in other words, it assumed that households had no conflicts or tensions when it came to making decisions that involved everyone (Ariza, 2007). The family was a “moral economic unit” based on the principles of “reciprocity, consensus and altruism” (Grasmuck and Pessar, 1991). Studies from a gender perspective pointed out that there were power relations in families based on a hierarchical, unequal distribution of rights, resources and authority that particularly affected women (Ariza, 2007; González Montes, 2002; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf, 1990). This criticism reached migration studies: migration was not an exclusively male phenomenon; women migrants were not appendages of male migration and their displacement could be based on personal motivation (Ariza, 2007; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007). Con base en la revisión de algunos estudios recientes que se han llevado a cabo en diversas comunidades rurales de las nuevas regiones migratorias, en este artículo se revisan, de manera crítica, dos interpretaciones de los estudios sobre la familia rural: la economía campesina como unidad de producción-consumo y el ciclo de desarrollo de la unidad doméstica. En las condiciones actuales la migración, interna e internacional, desempeña un papel decisivo en las comunidades rurales. Muchos estudios han constatado la voluntad de las mujeres de salir de los grupos domésticos y sumarse a los flujos migratorios por motivos particulares, por situaciones y demandas específicas de ellas; su salida ha contribuido al resquebrajamiento de los sistemas tradicionales de organización y reproducción de la familia campesina.Las feministas, y más tarde los estudios con la perspectiva de género, criticaron la visión de que las familias rurales constituían unidades de producción-consumo donde las decisiones correspondían a un modelo de estrategias familiares de sobrevivencia y reproducción (Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf, 1990). Ese modelo privilegiaba la homogeneidad, la colectividad, la solidaridad y el consenso, es decir, suponía que en los hogares no había conflictos ni tensiones a la hora de tomar decisiones que a todos comprometían (Ariza, 2007). La familia era una “unidad económica moral” que se sustentaba en los principios de “reciprocidad, consenso y altruismo” (Grasmuck y Pessar, 1991).Los estudios desde el enfoque de género señalaron que en las familias había relaciones de poder basadas en una distribución jerárquica y desigual de los derechos, recursos y autoridad que afectaban especialmente a las mujeres (Ariza, 2007; González Montes, 2002; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf, 1990). Las críticas alcanzaron a los estudios migratorios: la migración no era un fenómeno exclusivamente de los hombres, las migrantes no eran apéndices de la migración masculina y sus desplazamientos podían tener motivaciones particulares (Ariza, 2007; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007). El Colegio de México A.C. 2013-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Research Article Artículo de investigación evaluado por pares application/pdf application/xml https://estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx/index.php/edu/article/view/1440 10.24201/edu.v28i1.1440 Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2013): 82, January-April; 93-121 Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2013): 82, enero-abril; 93-121 2448-6515 0186-7210 spa https://estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx/index.php/edu/article/view/1440/1433 https://estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx/index.php/edu/article/view/1440/1845 Derechos de autor 2013 Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | migration peasant economy domestic development cycle migración mujeres economía campesina ciclo de desarrollo doméstico Arias, Patricia Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes |
| title | Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes |
| title_alt | Migration, Peasant Economy and Domestic Development Cycle. Discussions and Recent Studies |
| title_full | Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes |
| title_fullStr | Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes |
| title_short | Migración, economía campesina y ciclo de desarrollo doméstico. Discusiones y estudios recientes |
| title_sort | migracion economia campesina y ciclo de desarrollo domestico discusiones y estudios recientes |
| topic | migration peasant economy domestic development cycle migración mujeres economía campesina ciclo de desarrollo doméstico |
| topic_facet | migration peasant economy domestic development cycle migración mujeres economía campesina ciclo de desarrollo doméstico |
| url | https://estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx/index.php/edu/article/view/1440 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ariaspatricia migrationpeasanteconomyanddomesticdevelopmentcyclediscussionsandrecentstudies AT ariaspatricia migracioneconomiacampesinayciclodedesarrollodomesticodiscusionesyestudiosrecientes |