El debate sobre el futuro de México. Buscando una economía nueva; encontrando desafíos y límites, 1830-1845

By 1830, it was clear that the silver economy that made New Spain rich had collapsed and would not soon recover. Mexico’s commercial economy languished and the government searched for revenue. Debates followed. Lucas Alaman argued that a revival of silver and the rise of industry would bring growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tutino, John
Format: Online
Language:Spanish
Editor: El Colegio de México, A.C. 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://historiamexicana.colmex.mx/index.php/RHM/article/view/3181
Journal:

Historia Mexicana

Description
Summary:By 1830, it was clear that the silver economy that made New Spain rich had collapsed and would not soon recover. Mexico’s commercial economy languished and the government searched for revenue. Debates followed. Lucas Alaman argued that a revival of silver and the rise of industry would bring growth and fund government. Tadeo Ortiz insisted that Mexico become a commodity exporter—noting that strong exporters relied on slave labor. After the loss of Texas, the early 1840s saw Alaman defend his industrial vision while the liberal editors of Siglo xix published a British analysis calling for export development in California as a British-Mexican venture. An anonymous analyst, JG, closed debate in 1845, insisting that limited mining, industry for national markets, and modest exports (Mexicans would not abide slavery) were the only way. Then came war and the loss of California.