¿Soldados o policías? El pulso de las relaciones entre civiles y militares bajo López Obrador

In recent decades, pressures associated with changes in illicit drug markets, failed attempts to reform security and justice apparatuses, and the absence of civil leadership have resulted in a progressive and sustained trend towards militarization. During the six-year term of President Andrés Manuel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Serrano Carreto, Mónica del Carmen
Formato: Online
Idioma:español
Editor: El Colegio de México A.C. 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://forointernacional.colmex.mx/index.php/fi/article/view/3190
Revista:

Foro Internacional

Descripción
Sumario:In recent decades, pressures associated with changes in illicit drug markets, failed attempts to reform security and justice apparatuses, and the absence of civil leadership have resulted in a progressive and sustained trend towards militarization. During the six-year term of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), militarization not only gained particular strength but also stemmed from specific decisions made by the president that contributed to jeopardizing the future of democratic governance in Mexico. This article examines some of AMLO’s key decisions regarding the armed forces, with a special focus on the integration of the National Guard. The central argument is that, in the short and medium term, the cumulative effect of these decisions has altered the patterns and norms that have governed the relationships between politicians and soldiers for decades, thereby disturbing the balance between civil and military institutions. In the long term, in addition to compromising the institutional strength of the armed forces, it has raised doubts about the possibility of establishing effective democratic control over the military in Mexico.