Violencia en la práctica médica en México: un caso de ambivalencia sociológica

This paper presents a classification of the different types of violence to which doctors are exposed during training and professional practice. Actors alien to the medical field exert external violence, whereas practitioners, paramedical personnel and patients exert internal violence. The later can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro, Roberto, Villanueva Lozano, Marcia
Formato: Online
Idioma:español
Editor: El Colegio de México 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://estudiossociologicos.colmex.mx/index.php/es/article/view/1648
Revista:

Estudios Sociológicos

Descripción
Sumario:This paper presents a classification of the different types of violence to which doctors are exposed during training and professional practice. Actors alien to the medical field exert external violence, whereas practitioners, paramedical personnel and patients exert internal violence. The later can be hegemonic (when produced by authorities and doctors in power positions) or contra-hegemonic (if it defies such power structures). The hypothesis is that doctors maintain a relation of sociological ambivalence regarding the different types of violence to which they are exposed during their professional practice. This allows them to be very critical against external violence, and, at the same time, to normalize internal violence and take it as part of the profession. This ambivalence is illustrated with a series of empirical examples.