La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita

The essay discusses three important aspects at the very beginnings of Islam in the transition from a pre-islamic society to an Islamic society. The purposeof this work is to examine and contrast the main differences between these two types of society. Were there any changes which took place and whic...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ruiz, Manuel
Formato: Online
Idioma:espanhol
Editor: El Colegio de México 2016
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx/index.php/eaa/article/view/2172
Recursos:

Estudios de Asia y África

authentication_code dc
_version_ 1844256237456195584
author Ruiz, Manuel
author_facet Ruiz, Manuel
author_sort Ruiz, Manuel
category_str_mv "Bolivia", "hyperinflation", "economic crisis", "Bolivia", "hiperinflación", "crisis económica"
collection OJS
description The essay discusses three important aspects at the very beginnings of Islam in the transition from a pre-islamic society to an Islamic society. The purposeof this work is to examine and contrast the main differences between these two types of society. Were there any changes which took place and which were they?In the first place the article considers the formation of the ancient and ofthe new society. The pre-islamic society had its basis in the tribe, a group composed of individuals who recognized a common ancestor, that is, by common blood. The Islamic society, eventually called “Ummah”, is formed exclusivelyby those who believe in Allah as the only God, Creator of all that exists. Members of the Ummah also accept Muhammad as His messenger. It has little or nothing to do with blood ties. This criterion was applied in a very peculiar way to the Jewish tribe of the banu Awf in Medina. There are different opinions as to whether the Jewish tribe was or was not part of the Islamic Ummah. It is very enlightening to see how the Prophet provided a solution to this question. Such individuals were incorporated into the Ummah as “believers”. In this way, there never was a purely political, a secular Ummah, nor a plural religious community.In regard to the concept of “Sunnah”, the traditional or ancestral unwritten law of the preislamic society, did it continue to exist in Islamic times? Here we notice an important change. The Islamic Sunnah has a divine origin, it is not human law. Every innovation introduced by Muhammad to the old Sunnah has a Divine sanction, who obeys Muhammad obeys God. All the rituals of Islam, for instance, in regard to the pilgrimage, prayers, alms and fasting, were inspired by God and passed on to Muhammad. The same applies to decisions the Prophet took with regard to the social life of the Islamic community. The Muslims were paying attention to what the Prophet said and did in relation to the life of the community. In this way the concept of Prophetic Sunnah had to be present from the very beginnings of Islam and cannot be considered a late innovation introduced by the Islamic jurists to force the caliph, the political authority to submit the religiousLaw.Finally, in the transition from the pre-islamic Sayyid or Sheikh to the Caliph we notice a gradual change from one who is a primus inter pares to one who has the legitimate power to use physical force, or violence, to impose his will. But here the most important question is to see if the caliph, sometimes called “caliph of God”, had the right or authority to legislate, to create a body of laws with the same validity of those of the Prophet. In other words, is the caliph, or the political government, independent, superior or does he have to submit to religious law? There seems to be a consensus that the true Islamic government and ruler have to submit to the dictates of religious Law, to be considered a legitimate government or ruler. There is a discussion however, and different opinions as to whether or not verbal submission to Islam is sufficient or if a ruler has to has to practice more than that. This debate continues until today but without reaching a single common opinion.
format Online
id oai:oai.estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx:article-2172
index_str_mv CONAHCYT
LATINDEX
PKP Index
DOAJ
DORA
Redalyc
Scielo México
CLASE
Handbook of Latin American Studies (HLAS)
JSTOR
Dialnet
Sociological Abstracts
EBSCO Host
HELA
Scopus
Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory
CIRC
CSA Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
Google Scholar
Historical Abstracts
MLA
Biblat
Current Abstracts
Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek Frei zugängliche
Emerging Sources Citation Index de Web of Science
Scielo Citation Index (Web of Science)
Gale OneFile: Informe Académico
Journal Scholar Metrics (EC3 Research Group: Evaluación de la Ciencia y la Comunicación Científica. Universidad de Granada)
Article First
CARHUS Plus de la Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR)
Index Islamicus
InfoTracCustom
Matriu d’Infomació per l’Avaluació de Revistas (MIAR)
Open access digital library. Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
Political Science Complete
PubMed
SocINDEX
SocINDEX with Full Text
TOC Premier
Fondo Aleph. Biblioteca Virtual de Ciencias Sociales
HEAL-Link Hellenic Academic Libraries Link
Índice bibliográfico Publindex
LatinREV. Red latinoamericana de revistas
LINGMEX. Bibliografía lingüística de México desde 1970
Portal de Periódicos de la Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/MEC)
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
BACON (Base de Connaissance Nationale)
Bibliography of Asian Studies (Online)
Latin America & Iberia Database
Social Science Database
Social Science Premium Collection
Sistema integrado de Bibliotecas (USP)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Student
Poetry & Short Story Reference Center
MLA Directory of Periodicals
MLA International Bibliography
journal Estudios de Asia y África
language spa
publishDate 2016
publisher El Colegio de México
record_format ojs
Terms_governing_use_and_reproduction_note Derechos de autor 2016 Estudios de Asia y África
data_source_entry/ISSN Estudios de Asia y África; Vol. 51, No. 2 (160), May-August, 2016; 283-328
Estudios de Asia y África; Vol. 51, núm. 2 (160), mayo-agosto, 2016; 283-328
2448-654X
0185-0164
spelling oai:oai.estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx:article-21722025-08-16T03:31:34Z The Ummah, the Sunnah of the Prophet and the Caliph: The Sunni View La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita Ruiz, Manuel Islam Ummah Sunnah Caliph Pre-Islam Islam ummah sunnah califa preislam The essay discusses three important aspects at the very beginnings of Islam in the transition from a pre-islamic society to an Islamic society. The purposeof this work is to examine and contrast the main differences between these two types of society. Were there any changes which took place and which were they?In the first place the article considers the formation of the ancient and ofthe new society. The pre-islamic society had its basis in the tribe, a group composed of individuals who recognized a common ancestor, that is, by common blood. The Islamic society, eventually called “Ummah”, is formed exclusivelyby those who believe in Allah as the only God, Creator of all that exists. Members of the Ummah also accept Muhammad as His messenger. It has little or nothing to do with blood ties. This criterion was applied in a very peculiar way to the Jewish tribe of the banu Awf in Medina. There are different opinions as to whether the Jewish tribe was or was not part of the Islamic Ummah. It is very enlightening to see how the Prophet provided a solution to this question. Such individuals were incorporated into the Ummah as “believers”. In this way, there never was a purely political, a secular Ummah, nor a plural religious community.In regard to the concept of “Sunnah”, the traditional or ancestral unwritten law of the preislamic society, did it continue to exist in Islamic times? Here we notice an important change. The Islamic Sunnah has a divine origin, it is not human law. Every innovation introduced by Muhammad to the old Sunnah has a Divine sanction, who obeys Muhammad obeys God. All the rituals of Islam, for instance, in regard to the pilgrimage, prayers, alms and fasting, were inspired by God and passed on to Muhammad. The same applies to decisions the Prophet took with regard to the social life of the Islamic community. The Muslims were paying attention to what the Prophet said and did in relation to the life of the community. In this way the concept of Prophetic Sunnah had to be present from the very beginnings of Islam and cannot be considered a late innovation introduced by the Islamic jurists to force the caliph, the political authority to submit the religiousLaw.Finally, in the transition from the pre-islamic Sayyid or Sheikh to the Caliph we notice a gradual change from one who is a primus inter pares to one who has the legitimate power to use physical force, or violence, to impose his will. But here the most important question is to see if the caliph, sometimes called “caliph of God”, had the right or authority to legislate, to create a body of laws with the same validity of those of the Prophet. In other words, is the caliph, or the political government, independent, superior or does he have to submit to religious law? There seems to be a consensus that the true Islamic government and ruler have to submit to the dictates of religious Law, to be considered a legitimate government or ruler. There is a discussion however, and different opinions as to whether or not verbal submission to Islam is sufficient or if a ruler has to has to practice more than that. This debate continues until today but without reaching a single common opinion. El propósito del presente trabajo es encontrar la relación entre gobernantes, gobernados y la ley que los gobierna en los primeros años del islam. El Colegio de México 2016-05-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/xml https://estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx/index.php/eaa/article/view/2172 10.24201/eaa.v51i2.2172 Estudios de Asia y África; Vol. 51, No. 2 (160), May-August, 2016; 283-328 Estudios de Asia y África; Vol. 51, núm. 2 (160), mayo-agosto, 2016; 283-328 2448-654X 0185-0164 spa https://estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx/index.php/eaa/article/view/2172/2170 https://estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx/index.php/eaa/article/view/2172/2296 Derechos de autor 2016 Estudios de Asia y África
spellingShingle Islam
Ummah
Sunnah
Caliph
Pre-Islam
Islam
ummah
sunnah
califa
preislam
Ruiz, Manuel
La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita
title La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita
title_alt The Ummah, the Sunnah of the Prophet and the Caliph: The Sunni View
title_full La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita
title_fullStr La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita
title_full_unstemmed La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita
title_short La ummah, la sunnah del profeta y el califa: la visión sunita
title_sort la ummah la sunnah del profeta y el califa la vision sunita
topic Islam
Ummah
Sunnah
Caliph
Pre-Islam
Islam
ummah
sunnah
califa
preislam
topic_facet Islam
Ummah
Sunnah
Caliph
Pre-Islam
Islam
ummah
sunnah
califa
preislam
url https://estudiosdeasiayafrica.colmex.mx/index.php/eaa/article/view/2172
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizmanuel theummahthesunnahoftheprophetandthecaliphthesunniview
AT ruizmanuel laummahlasunnahdelprofetayelcalifalavisionsunita
AT ruizmanuel ummahthesunnahoftheprophetandthecaliphthesunniview