Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China?
This article analyzes legitimacy in China and expands the traditional tripartite division between legitimacy of origin, performance, and destination. Also, it divides the legitimacy of origin into the legitimacy of institutions and legitimacy of the authorities, and considers that crises, e...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | español |
| Editor: |
El Colegio de México A.C.
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx/index.php/aap/article/view/337 |
| Revista: |
Anuario Asia Pacífico |
| authentication_code | dc |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1831978447941926912 |
| author | Oviedo, Eduardo Daniel |
| author_facet | Oviedo, Eduardo Daniel |
| author_sort | Oviedo, Eduardo Daniel |
| category_str_mv |
"Bolivia", "hyperinflation", "economic crisis", "Bolivia", "hiperinflación", "crisis económica"
|
| collection | OJS |
| description | This article analyzes legitimacy in China and expands the traditional tripartite division between legitimacy of origin, performance, and destination. Also, it divides the legitimacy of origin into the legitimacy of institutions and legitimacy of the authorities, and considers that crises, efficacy, and uncertainty are three key terms to understand the current state of legitimacy in this country. In other words, a legitimacy of origin in crisis since 1989, the effectiveness of the results of modernization, and the uncertainty about whether the regime will maintain its current legitimacy. For the time being, the Chinese Communist Party uses multifaceted arguments to explain political domination based mainly on socioeconomic achievements, but since these are unstable, it urges to reinventing its sources. In this sense, the theoretical proposals oscillate between Confucianism and democracy, with a midpoint in modern Neo-Confucianism. However, the communist government is following a conservative course, although President Xi Jinping introduced traditional procedures in the 2018 constitutional amendment. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx:article-337 |
| journal | Anuario Asia Pacífico |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | El Colegio de México A.C. |
| record_format | ojs |
| Terms_governing_use_and_reproduction_note | Derechos de autor 2022 Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México |
| data_source_entry/ISSN | Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México; 2022; 1-33 Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México; 2022; 1-33 2683-1430 |
| spelling | oai:oai.anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx:article-3372023-07-16T22:56:37Z Legitimacy: China’s Dilemma? Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? Oviedo, Eduardo Daniel legitimidad cambio político totalitarismo confucianismo transición política legitimacy political change totalitarianism Confucianism political transition This article analyzes legitimacy in China and expands the traditional tripartite division between legitimacy of origin, performance, and destination. Also, it divides the legitimacy of origin into the legitimacy of institutions and legitimacy of the authorities, and considers that crises, efficacy, and uncertainty are three key terms to understand the current state of legitimacy in this country. In other words, a legitimacy of origin in crisis since 1989, the effectiveness of the results of modernization, and the uncertainty about whether the regime will maintain its current legitimacy. For the time being, the Chinese Communist Party uses multifaceted arguments to explain political domination based mainly on socioeconomic achievements, but since these are unstable, it urges to reinventing its sources. In this sense, the theoretical proposals oscillate between Confucianism and democracy, with a midpoint in modern Neo-Confucianism. However, the communist government is following a conservative course, although President Xi Jinping introduced traditional procedures in the 2018 constitutional amendment. Este artículo analiza la legitimidad en China y amplía la tradicional división tripartita entre legitimidad de origen, desempeño y destino. Asimismo, divide la legitimidad de origen en legitimidad de las instituciones y legitimidad de las autoridades, y considera que crisis, eficacia e incertidumbre son tres términos clave para entender el estado actual de la legitimidad en este país. Es decir, una legitimidad de origen en crisis desde 1989, la efectividad de los resultados de la modernización, y la incertidumbre sobre si el régimen mantendrá su legitimidad actual. Por el momento, el Partido Comunista Chino utiliza argumentos multifacéticos para explicar la dominación política basados principalmente en los logros socioeconómicos, pero como éstos son inestables, insta a reinventar sus fuentes. En este sentido, las propuestas teóricas oscilan entre el confucianismo y la democracia, con punto medio en el neoconfucianismo moderno. Sin embargo, el gobierno comunista sigue un derrotero conservador, si bien el presidente Xi Jinping introdujo procedimientos tradicionales en la enmienda constitucional de 2018. El Colegio de México A.C. 2022-05-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/xml https://anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx/index.php/aap/article/view/337 10.24201/aap.2022.337 Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México; 2022; 1-33 Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México; 2022; 1-33 2683-1430 spa https://anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx/index.php/aap/article/view/337/352 https://anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx/index.php/aap/article/view/337/367 Derechos de autor 2022 Anuario Asia Pacífico El Colegio de México |
| spellingShingle | legitimidad cambio político totalitarismo confucianismo transición política legitimacy political change totalitarianism Confucianism political transition Oviedo, Eduardo Daniel Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? |
| title | Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? |
| title_alt | Legitimacy: China’s Dilemma? |
| title_full | Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? |
| title_fullStr | Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? |
| title_short | Legitimidad: ¿el dilema de China? |
| title_sort | legitimidad el dilema de china |
| topic | legitimidad cambio político totalitarismo confucianismo transición política legitimacy political change totalitarianism Confucianism political transition |
| topic_facet | legitimidad cambio político totalitarismo confucianismo transición política legitimacy political change totalitarianism Confucianism political transition |
| url | https://anuarioasiapacifico.colmex.mx/index.php/aap/article/view/337 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oviedoeduardodaniel legitimacychinasdilemma AT oviedoeduardodaniel legitimidadeldilemadechina |